Pedagogical Anthropology - English Restoration ## Chapter 06 - The Skin and Pigments *Pigmentation and Cutaneous Apparatus.*—The outer covering of the body possesses an importance that is not only physiological, as a defense of the living animal, but biological and ethnical as well. In fact, the covering of the body frequently constitutes a characteristic of the species, and we may say that it constitutes to a large extent the æsthetics of coloration, supplementing that of form. In the covering of the body there are in general certain appendages which include the double purpose of defense and attraction, as, for example, the scales of fishes, the quills of the porcupine, the marvellous plumage of certain birds, the furry coat of the ermine. Man, on the contrary, is almost completely deprived of any covering of the skin, and is conspicuous among all animals as the most defenseless and naked. Consequently, the characteristics of the skin itself, quite apart from any covering, assume in man a great ethnic importance, especially as regards his pigmentation. In fact, it is well known that the fundamental classifications of the human races due to Blumenbach and Linnaeus are based upon the cutaneous pigmentation (white, black, yellow races, etc.). This is because it is a recognised fact that the pigmentation is biologically associated with race, and hence inalterable and hereditary, in the same way, for example, as the cephalic index; although we must not forget the modifications of pigment through phenomena due to adaptation to environment. This would lead us into scientific discussions which would here be out of place, since they have no immediate importance to us as educators. It may suffice to indicate that the distribution of racial colour should not be studied in relation to temperature and the direction of the sun's rays, but rather in connection with the history of human emigration; because, while as a matter of fact it is true that there are races at the equator which are darker and races near the poles which are fairer, it is also true that the Esquimaux, for instance, are a dark race, while in Lybia there are types of ashen blond, which is the palest blond in the whole range of human pigmentation. The pigment is distributed throughout the skin, the cutaneous appendages and the iris. In the skin, the distribution is not uniform, there being some regions of the body that have more, and some that have less; it is localised in the Malpighian mucous layer, *i.e.*, the granular, germinative layer of the epidermis, which rests directly upon the papillæ of the derma or corium. The derma, being abundantly supplied with blood-vessels, if seen by itself would appear red; but this color, due to the blood, is concealed to a greater or less extent by the epidermis, according as the latter contains more or less pigment. In the iris of the eye and in the piliferous appendages of the skin, among which we must, from the anthropological point of view, give chief place to the hair of the head, the pigment tends to accumulate, producing a constantly deeper shade. Pigmentation constitutes an eminently descriptive characteristic, and consequently, in all attempts to determine it, must be subject to all manner of oscillations in judgment on the part of the observer; yet, because it also constitutes an ethnical characteristic, it deserves to be determined with precision. To this end we have in anthropology *chromatic charts*, corresponding not only to the various shades of the skin, but also to those of the piliferous appendages and of the iris. They consist of a graduated series of colour-tones extending over the entire possible range of the real colours of pigmentation in human beings; and every gradation in tone has a corresponding number. When we wish to use the charts practically, for the purpose of determining accurately the precise degree of pigmentation of a given person's hair, we need only to compare the tone of the hair with the colours of the chart, and, having identified the right one, to note the corresponding number. For instance, we may record: "Pigmentation of hair = 34 Br. (*i.e.*, No. 34 in Broca's table). Or, again, if we are making a more complex study of all the children in a certain school, we may say: "The chestnut tones (35, 42, 43 Br.) constitute 87 per cent., the remaining percentage consists of the blond shades (36, 37, 46 Br.). And in the case of the skin and the iris the procedure is analogous. By this means the investigation is objective and accurate. As a rule, the three pigmentations are determined in accordance with a reciprocal correspondence. The light colourings, as well as the dark, generally go together; *i.e.*, a person having blond hair has also light eyes and a fair skin, and *vice versa*—in other words, the entire organism has either a greater or less accumulation of pigment in all its centres of pigmentation. Furthermore, these anthropological characteristics are accompanied by others of equal ethnical importance, such as the stature, the cephalic index, etc.; and all of them combine to determine an ethnic type in all its complex morphology. In this, as in all other anthropological data, it is necessary to determine the limits between which it may oscillate. In the races of mankind, the colour of the skin ranges from a black brown to a gray brown, to brick red, to yellow, and to white; but among the population of Italy, and among Europeans in general (excepting certain localised groups, like the Lapps, etc.), the variation is confined within the limits of the so-called white tones, that is, from brunette to a sallow white, a rosy white, or a florid red, with each of which tints there are special corresponding grades of pigmentation for hair and eyes, and also, on broad, general lines, different ethnical characteristics oscillating within our normal limits of stature and cephalic index. All of which may be summarised in the following table: | Pigmentation | Stature | Cephalic index | | ------------ | ------- | -------------- | | Skin | Hair | Iris | | Brunette | Black | Black | Medium or low | Dolichocephalic, | | Yellow-white<br>Pink-white | Light chestnut & blond. | Chestnut and blue. | Medium or high | Brachycephalic | | Florid red | Red | Gray | (Outside of ethnical characteristics: the red colour of the hair is abnormal) | in which we have also included the abnormal colour of red hair, which plays a part in the actual colour scale of Italian pigmentation: not, however, as a racial characteristic, but rather as a deviation. In addition to the oscillation of limits, we should also study in any given population the geographic distribution of a definite anthropological datum. This must also be done in the case of the pigments. Among Livi's splendid charts, there is one regarding the distribution of the brunette type in Italy. From this it appears that the greatest prevalence of the brunette type is in Sardinia and Calabria, and that in general there is a prevalence of the dark types in the southern districts; while the lowest percentage of brunettes is found in Piedmont, Lombardy and Venetia, and in general the number of brunettes is less in northern and central Italy. The relative distribution of other ethnical data should be noted, such as the stature and the cephalic index, in the corresponding charts. By combining these results, we find that in the north of Italy the prevalent type is blond, brachycephalic, and of tall stature; while in the south it is a dark, dolichocephalic type, of low stature. This is what I succeeded in showing in my work upon the women of Latium, in which I sought to complete the details of these two ethnic types. In Latium there is a prevalence of the dark, dolichocephalic type of low stature, a type that is still almost pure at Castelli Romani; this type is fine, slender and delicate in formation, and corresponds to Sergi's Mediterranean stock, to which are due the great Egyptian and Græco-Roman civilisations. The other race is blond, tall and brachycephalic, and has only a scanty representation in southern Latium, but is prevalent in an almost pure form in the neighborhood of Orte. This type is much coarser and more massive in its formation, with a euriplastic skeleton, and corresponds to Sergi's Eurasian race that immigrated from the continent. --- In general, we may say that it is foreordained in our biological destiny not only what form, but also what colouring we ought to attain in the course of our individual evolution, when we finally arrive at mature development. *The Pigments during Growth.*—In the course of individual evolution, it is not only the form that becomes modified, but the pigments as well. We know, for example, that children are more blond than adults. Transformations in regard to the pigments occur, however, more especially at the period of puberty. *Pigmentation of the Hair.*—The colour of the hair becomes darker in the course of growth, changing from light chestnut to dark, from blond to light chestnut, from dark to black, from light auburn to fiery red. Sometimes this darkening of the hair is accompanied by a change in tone (from blond to chestnut); at other times it consists in an *intensification* of the original colour through an increase of pigment, which *fixes* and *defines* a colour that was previously indefinite. In children who were ill or ailing during their early years, in other words, weakly children (through denutrition, exhausting illnesses, overexertion), this phenomenon is imperfectly achieved, just as their growth as a whole is imperfectly achieved. The consequence is that these weaklings retain a paler and less decided pigmentation, which explains the fact that statistics show a greater proportion of frail, rachitic, tuberculous and mentally deficient persons among the blonds than among the brunettes; but it is among that class of blonds whose light colour represents an arrest of development (suppressed brunettes). Social conditions also exert an influence upon the colour of the hair; a larger number of blonds and of lighter and more indefinite blonds are to be found in the schools for the poor than in those for the rich; also a larger number in country schools, where the poverty is greater, than in city schools. Consequently we may conclude that there are two classes of blonds: that which is associated with a racial type, and that which is the consequence of arrested development. The first type has a vivid, uniform and decisive colour tone, accompanied by physiological robustness; the second is indefinite in colour tone and lacks uniformity—for example, the more exposed parts of the body are paler, and the hair varies in tone, some locks showing greater intensity of colour than others. This is especially noticeable in frail young girls from the country, where the sun discolours the surface layer of hair. In this connection it should be remembered that in those geographical regions where the rays of the sun are most nearly perpendicular, the pigments are, on the contrary, darker and that the skin becomes bronzed under the ardent kiss of the sun. But while the sun intensifies the tints that are strong with life, it destroys those that are weak and moribund, just as it does in the case of lifeless fabrics, which become bleached out by the action of the solar light. Accordingly the pigments give us an important test for judging the robustness of the body; the blonds who are the product of arrested development of brown tones that have not been attained because of weakness, are frail in health and physical resistance, which is the basis of the popular belief that vigorous wet-nurses must be brunettes. As a matter of fact, in our own population of Latium the brunette type prevails over the blond by a percentage of 86 per cent.; and it may be that a blond Roman wet-nurse is a weakly creature, just as a Roman red wine is in all probability a white wine that has been coloured. --- *Pigmentation of the Iris.*—In regard to the coloration of the eyes, a change often takes place at puberty which is the opposite to that already noted in regard to the hair: *the eyes become more* *uniformly light*; this happens in the majority of cases. In the coloration of the eyes it is necessary to distinguish two factors, the *uvea* and the *pigment*. The iris has a fundamental and uniform light colour (due to the *uvea*) which oscillates, according to the individual, between blue and greenish. In this layer the pigment is deposited; it may be more or less intense in tone, shading from yellow to a dark maroon. When the pigment is wanting or is very scant, the fundamental blue or greenish colour of the uvea is apparent. In little children the pigment is distributed over the uvea in a manner by no means uniform, in little masses or spots that are usually of a mixed colour, so that the colour of the iris in infancy may be uncertain. At puberty a uniform distribution of the pigment already accumulated takes place; but rarely an intensification. Hence the colour becomes more decided, but not deeper, as Godin has recently succeeded in proving. *Pigmentation of the Skin.*—In the colouring of the skin it is necessary to distinguish between that which is due to the blood and that which is due to the pigment. The blood, whose colour shows transparently through the layers of the epidermis, produces the various pinkish tones. The pigment, deposited in all races of mankind under the Malpighian layer, produces the various brownish tones. The quantity of cutaneous pigment is a constant *racial* factor—a hereditary factor. Nevertheless, in certain individuals, it may be influenced by external agents (sunshine, heat) which tend to cause it to vary; such alterations produce *individual varieties*, and also variations in coloration of the skin between the covered parts of the body and those exposed to the sun or to atmospheric action in general; these variations, one and all, are not hereditary. At puberty the pigment is increased in certain portions of the body in connection with the generative functions which become established at that time. Besides this, the general pigmentation is intensified; children are whiter than adults. *The Skin and the Hair during the Evolution of the Organism.*—In the case of the hair also, the pigment does not remain a constant quantity throughout the different periods of life. Grey hair is a normal sign of the decadence of an organism which has entered upon its involution. As is well known, the hair of the head, the beard, and in general all the piliferous appendages turn white, beginning in the regions where the hair is most abundant, *i.e.*, on the head. In some men, however, the hairs of the beard are the first to turn grey; this is not perfectly normal, it is an *inferior* manner of growing old. A German proverb says, that he who works much with the head (the thinking class) turns grey first in his hair, and that he who works much with his mouth (the hearty eater) turns grey first in his beard. The skin also gives manifest signs of decadence in the form of *wrinkles*. These serve up to a certain point as documentary evidence of the life which the individual has led and the *high* or *low* *type* to which he belongs. Just as in the case of grey hair, it is the class of thinkers who have the most wrinkles on their forehead; those who were given over to baser passions, such as called for labial rather than frontal expression, have on the contrary, more wrinkles around the mouth. We know how the peasant class has a veritable halo of wrinkles around the mouth. Thinkers, on the contrary, have a single vertical furrow in the middle of the forehead: the line of thought. The transverse lines on the forehead are parallel and unconnected. Faces with precocious wrinkles may be met with, even in children (denutrition, mental anxiety, dystrophic conditions); and conversely, there are faces which have been preserved unwrinkled up to an advanced age (especially in the case of women of the aristocracy, in whom it may happen that neither suffering nor mental effort has left its traces on their lives). *Pigmentation of the Hair.*—This anthropological datum merits special consideration, since it plays so large a part in the æsthetics of the human body; and also preserves certain constant characteristics that serve to differentiate the races. In a study of the hair it is necessary to consider the *quantity*, the *disposition* and the *form*. Abundant, strong, sleek hair is in physiological relation to robustness of body. Thin hair, on the contrary, or hair that is easily extirpated at the slightest pull, or dry hair, indicate insufficient nutrition, which may also be connected with dystrophic or pathological conditions (hereditary syphilis, cretinism). The normal disposition of the hair is characteristic, but it may assume a number of individual variations, as has recently been shown by Dr. Sergio Sergi, son of our mutual instructor Giuseppe Sergi (Sergio Sergi, *Sulla disposizione dei capelli intorno* *alla fronte*—"The disposition of the hair upon the forehead"—Acts of the Società di Antropologia, Vol. 13, No. 1). The hair, after forming a single whorl or *vortex*, corresponding to the *obelion*, flows over the forehead in either two or three divisions, the *lines of the parting* (either lateral lines or a single central line) corresponding to the natural divisions of the flowing hair. Across the forehead the hair ceases at the line of *the roots*, which crowns the face cornice-like; it is a sinuous line and rises at the sides in two points, corresponding to the natural partings of the hair. The hair stops normally at the boundary-line of the forehead, which together with the face forms the *visage*, leaving bare that part which in man corresponds to that portion of the frontal bone that rises erect above the orbital arches, *i.e.*, the human portion of the forehead. The form of the hair is an ethnical characteristic. Among our European populations the extreme forms are wanting, namely, *smooth* hair (stiff, coarse, sparse hair peculiar to the red and yellow races, such as the American Indian, Esquinaux, Samoyed and Chinese), and *kinky* hair (wooly hair, curling in fine, close spirals, such as is found in all its variations among the Australians and the African negroes). Consequently, we cannot use the words *smooth* or *kinky* for the purpose of qualifying the forms of hair found in our populations. We may, however, meet with *straight* hair (not *smooth*), or *curly* hair (not *kinky*). In addition to these forms, which among us represent the extremes, there are also two other forms—namely, *wavy* hair (in ample curves) and *spiral* hair (forming much narrower curves, the so-called ringlets). Corresponding to these various qualities of hair, there are essential differences in the physical structure of the stem or shaft of the hair itself. If we make transverse sections of hair and examine them under the microscope, we find that the resulting geometrical figures are not all equal: the forms of the sections oscillate between rounded and ellipsoidal forms. Furthermore, there are races in which we may find hair having a circular section (*smooth* hair) and there are others in which we may find, on the contrary, an extremely elongated elliptical section (*kinky* hair); in the first case the hair is a long, bristly cylinder; in the second, it is a ribbon with a tendency to roll up.  Fig. 130. In general, the straighter the hair is, the nearer its cross-section approaches a perfect circle; and the more curly it is, the nearer its cross-section approaches an elongated ellipse. The accompanying examples are drawn from the results of my own study of the women of Latium; they represent five microscopic preparations. The figure in the middle (No. 3) represents *straight* hair; the two figures, No. 1 and 5, are from curly hair; No. 2 is wavy hair, and No. 4, close-curled hair, or ringlets. Thus we see how widely the sections of hair differ according to the relative degree of curliness; and conversely, how identical the two sections, Nos. 1 and 5 are, both of them taken from equally curly hair, although from different heads. Straight hair has an almost circular section, although, slightly elliptical; this proves that really straight hair does not exist; in fact, even when it attains the maximum degree of smoothness, it retains a tendency to curl, which is shown, if in no other way, by the readiness with which it acquires a waviness, if habitually kept braided. There is no other section so perfectly circular as that of the red races, thus demonstrating the bristle-like rigidity of the smooth type of hair. Wavy hair is that which, in the form of its section, approaches most nearly to straight hair; it is a slightly elongated ellipse (No. 2). *Anomalies relating to the Pigment, the Skin and the Piliferous* *Appendages: Pigment and Skin.*—There are certain congenital anomalies of the skin, occasionally to be met with, among which I make note of the following principal ones: *a. Anomalies due to Hypertrophy of the Pigment and the Corium:* *Ichthyosis.*—The surface of the skin presents large, raised, irregular patches of various dark colours tending to maroon. *b. Anomalies due to Hypertrophy of the Pigment*: 1. *Nævi Materni*: dark isolated spots (moles, birth-marks). 2. *Freckles*: small, light brown spots, no larger than the head of a pin, scattered over the body, principally on the chest and face. 3. *Melanosis*: the entire skin has a dark appearance, similar to that of the lower races of mankind, but especially on the face and hands. *c. Anomalies due to Atrophy of the Pigment. Albinism.*—The skin presents an appearance of milky whiteness; even the hair is white, and the iris of the eye is red. *Wrinkles.*—The wrinkles of the face are deserving of attention, as being a detail of noteworthy importance. In regard to wrinkles, two points should be noted; a. precocity; b. anomalies. *a. Precocity of Wrinkles.*—This is an indication of rapid involution, and is frequently met with in degenerates. Idiotic children often show a flabby, shrivelled skin, overstrewn with a multitude of wrinkles that give them the aspect of little old men. *b. Anomalies*: the following are to be specially noted: 1. Transverse wrinkles on the nose, frequent in flat-nosed idiots. 2. Wrinkles on the forehead; in normal persons these are interrupted and broken, they are not quite parallel, nor perfectly horizontal, nor very deep. In degenerates it is frequently noticed that the wrinkles on the forehead form one continuous horizontal line, extending completely across it; sometimes it is so deep that it seems to divide the forehead transversely into two parts. The various wrinkles, straight and unbroken, are quite parallel. 3\. The zygomatic (cheek-bone) wrinkles and the wrinkles around the mouth are extremely deep in mentally defective adult and aged persons, and also in criminals, whose facial expression is especially active in the region of the nose and mouth, which constitute the least contemplative portion of the face. *Anomalies of the Hair.—1. Quantity.*—The quantity of hair may be excessive—*polytrichia*, a mark of degeneration easily to be met with among delinquents and prostitutes; or there may be a scarcity of hair—*atrichia*, among neuropaths, feeble-minded and cretins. Sometimes, precocious baldness occurs, as a result of defective nutrition of the skin.  Fig. 131.—Showing various types of the line of roots of the hair. *2. Disposition.*—We should note: a. the line of roots of the hair; b. the vortices. *a. Line of Roots.*—This may be situated *too* *far down* upon the forehead, in which case it gives a false impression of a low forehead, or *too far back*, in which case it gives a false impression of a high forehead. Note in addition the form of the line of roots; it ought to be, as we have already said, sinuous; sometimes, on the contrary, this line is straight, and forms a uniform curve, without sinuosity, across the forehead (imbeciles); at other times it descends in a peak at the middle point of the forehead. *b. Vortices.*—Normally, there ought to be one central whorl or vortex over the sinciput. Abnormally it may happen: That the vortex is misplaced—above, below or laterally; That the vortex is double; That there are also vortices along the frontal line of roots, or near this line. *3. Form.*—It sometimes happens that we find in degenerates forms of hair that are normal in inferior races, *i.e.*, smooth hair, or kinky, wooly hair. *Grey Hair.*—Sometimes in the case of degenerates or those suffering from dystrophy, a precocious greyness occurs (grey-haired young men, children with white hair); or a partial congenital greyness (clumps of white hair). No form of grey hair, however, should be confused with albinism. *Anomalies relating to the Eyebrows and the Beard. The Eyebrows.*—Various anomalies may occur, in respect to the quantity of hair, and the form of the eyebrows. The hairs may be too abundant or too scanty. The form may be *oblique*, in degenerate mongoloid types. A notable anomaly consists in a union of the eyebrows, which meet and form an unbroken line across the region of the glabella. The "united eyebrows" constitute a grave sign of degeneration, and are popularly regarded in Italy as a mark of the "*jettatura*" or "evil eye." *Beard.*—It may be very thick or very thin. Too thick a beard is important, especially if the hairs are also abundant on the cheeks and even on the forehead, a characteristic that is frequently accompanied by an abundant growth of hair over the entire body (general hypertrichosis). A thin beard and moustache may constitute a normal characteristic in certain races, such as the Kaffirs and other African negro tribes; as also in the Chinese. In our own race, on the contrary, it is an abnormal characteristic, which has been interpreted as a sexual inversion (feminism) and is met with frequently among thieves. ### Morphological Analysis of Certain Organs (Stigmata) In our morphological analysis of certain organs, we shall have occasion to enumerate a number of separate *malformations*, to the study of which criminal anthropology has devoted much attention. Since many of these are met with in children, we will make a rapid enumeration of them, but must keep in mind that the ability to distinguish the abnormal form from the normal requires practice in the actual observation of subjects, while mere verbal descriptions may lead to false and confusing impressions. SYNOPTIC CHART | Eyes | position | | ---- | -------- | | rima palpebrarum or eye-slit | high type | | low type | | size of eye-ball | macrophthalmia | | microphthalmia | | exophthalmia | | sclerotic coat | | foramina (pupils) | miosis | | mydriasis | | anisocoria | | Ears | asymmetrics | position | | form | | malformations | Wildermuth's ear | | embryonal ear | | Morel's ear | | handle-shaped ear | | crumpled ear | | canine ear, etc. | | Nose | types | leptorrhine | | platyrrhine | | mesorrhine | | anomalies | flat | | crooked | | trilobate | | Buccal apparatus | lips | simian mouth | | negroid mouth | | hare-lip, etc. | | teeth | number | | dimensions | | form | | diastemata | | irregular position | | tongue | macroglossia | | microglossia | | palate | ogival (pointed arch) | | cleft | *Generalities.*—Passing on to a more minute study of form, we shall have to invade the field of human æsthetics. The proportions of the body are all determined, in respect to their harmony; and especially admirable is the harmony existing between the principal parts of the human physiognomy. Artists know that in a regular face the length of the eye is equal to the interocular distance, or to the width of the nose, while the latter stands to the width of the mouth in a ratio of 2 to 3. The length of the external ear remains, at all ages, exactly equal to the sum of the width of the two eyes. The eyes and the external ears grow but little, consequently they are relatively quite large in children. The nose and mouth, on the contrary, grow much more, and hence appear quite small in infancy. The growth of the face, like that of the whole body, is an evolution. Among all the harmonies of the human body, that which can undergo the greatest numbers of alterations in the course of its evolution is the reciprocal harmony between the parts of the face. There are more children than grown persons with beautiful faces, because the efforts of adaptation to environment, or congenital biological causes, or pathological causes may easily alter the evolution of the face. We will take a rapid glance at the principal morphological anomalies likely to be encountered in connection with the face. All the malformations that we are about to enumerate are still included under the generic name of *stigmata*, and they may be *degenerative stigmata* (congenital anomalies), *pathological stigmata* (acquired through disease), or *stigmata of caste* (caused by adaptation to environment). *Anomalies relating to the Eye.*—The eyes may be too far apart (usually in broad, square faces of the Mongolian type), or too near together (for the most part in long narrow faces, with a hooked nose). *Rima Palpebrarum (Eye-slit).*—A straight, narrow slit (low type); an oblique slit (Mongolian eye). *Size of Eye-ball.*—The eye-ball may be too large (*macrophthalmia*) and hence often protrudes from the socket (*exophthalmia*); or it may be too small and deep-sunken (*microphthalmia*), or asymmetrical in size (one eye-ball larger than the other). *Direction.—Strabism* (inward, outward, mono-lateral, bilateral). *Sclerotic Coat.*—It may be injected with blood (delinquents), or partly covered over by an abnormal development of the semilunar *plica* or fold of the palpebral conjunctiva. *Pupillary Foramina.*—The two foramina of the pupils ought to be equal in size, circular and with a clearly marked contour. But under various conditions of age and ill health the size as well as the equality of the pupils may vary. As regards the size of the pupils: When the pupillary foramina are too small, this constitutes *miosis*—a condition frequently found in certain serious nervous diseases (locomotor ataxia, paralytic dementia), and in chronic opium poisoning; it is frequent in meningitis. In old persons miosis is a normal condition. When, on the contrary, the foramina of the pupils are too large, this constitutes *mydriasis* (poisoning from atropine, intestinal diseases, etc.). In addition to these, there is *anisocoria*, when the two foramina are unequal (neurasthenia, chronic alcoholism, first stage of paralytic dementia). *Form of the Pupillary Foramen.*—It is not always round, sometimes it is oval (cat's-eye). Frequently the form of the pupil is permanently altered as the result of a surgical operation. Thus, the contour of the pupil may be broken instead of clear cut; in verifying this phenomenon it is important to inquire whether the subject has suffered from any progressive disease of the iris, such as might produce the same condition. *Anomalies of the Ear.*—While in the case of animals the external ear is greatly developed, movable and detached from the cranium, in man it is reduced in size, immovable and attached to the cranium. Two measurements are taken of the ear, the length and the width, and by means of the usual formula we obtain the index of the ear, which for the European race is about 54 per cent. This index has a certain importance because we find that the proportion of width to length steadily increases as we descend through the inferior human races, down to the ape, and the same increase continues if we descend through the different grades of the simian order. This is to a large extent a result of the fact that, in the descent from man to ape, the lobule of the ear, which is essentially a human form, steadily diminishes, until it finally disappears. From this it may be concluded that there exist minute zoological differences other than generic between man and animals. As to malformations of the human ear, which may consist of shortness or absence of the lobule (formerly interpreted as a simian inheritance) they are to-day attributed to physiological causes. An abundant circulation produces an ample and *fleshy* lobe; in oligohæmic constitutions (deficiency of blood) the lobe is delicate, pale and even atrophied. Brachysceles often have a big lobe, and macrosceles, predisposed to phthisis, often have no lobe. In regard to the external ear we should observe: 1\. *Symmetry.*—The ears should be symmetrical: a. In respect to their position. b. In respect to the more or less pronounced divergence of the ears from the cranium. c. In respect to their form. a. *Position.*—We must look for this form of asymmetry by observing the cranium according to the occipital norm. The asymmetry may be caused by one of the ears being placed *too high up* or *too far back* in respect to the other, or both asymmetries may occur together. b. The asymmetry due to divergence is observed from two norms, the facial and the occipital. c. Asymmetry of *form* is perceived by observing successively the two external ears according to the lateral norms; their morphological aspect should correspond on the two sides. 2\. *Anatomy and Malformations of the External Ear.*—A preliminary anatomical note is necessary. The external ear consists of various parts, which were first studied and named by Fabricius of Acquapendente: 1. *The Helix.*—This is the outermost fold of the ear; it takes its origin above the auricular foramen in a root starting from the inside of the concha and rises upward, to descend again describing a regular helix; and it terminates in the *lobule*. At the point where the helix bends downward to form the descending branch, a small cartilaginous formation can be discerned by the sense of touch; this is the *Darwinian tubercle*. 2. The *Antihelix.*—This originates in two roots under the ascending branch of the helix and terminates in the *antitragus*; it is a cartilaginous formation. 3. *The Auricular Fossa.*—This divides the helix from the antihelix. 4. *The Tragus.*—This is a little triangular cartilaginous formation situated in front of the auricular foramen. Between the tragus and the antitragus is the *intertragical fossa*. 5. *The Concha.*—This is the concavity, the internal fossa of the auricle, which leads to the channel of the internal ear. Instances may be found of *malformation* of each and all of these various parts of the ear, which may be excessively developed, or almost wanting, or altered in form. *The Helix.*—The over-folding of the cartilage may be wanting, leaving the margin of the auricle straight; this form is met with in the Mongolian race, but among us it is a malformation (Morel's ear). It is a more serious malformation if it occurs combined with excessive development of the Darwinian tubercle; in this case the auricle assumes a really animal-like aspect ("canine ear"). The helix may originate within the concha from a root so prolonged that it divides the concha itself into two parts, an upper and a lower. The helix may be greatly developed and sharply divergent from the cranium—handle-shaped ear; or it may be bent at an angle at the upper outer margin—*embryonal* *ear*. The *lobule* is, as we have already said, an essentially human formation, and as though man were conscious of this fact and proud of it, it is customary in all races to adorn it with ear-rings, to such an extent that in India and in Cochin-China the lobe is burdened with ornaments of great weight, in consequence of which it has continued to develop until it almost touches the shoulder. The lobule may be attached to the cheek (sessile lobule). The antihelix may be so developed as to rise in front of the helix—*Wildermuth's* *ear*. Another important malformation connected with the ear, which is commonly found in idiots, is a prolongation and restriction of the intertragical fossa into a fissure (*fissura intertragica*). The tragus ought normally to exceed the antitragus in dimensions. *Anomalies of the Nose.*—The nose presents very numerous individual varieties, even among normal individuals. In the European race we distinguish the straight nose (Italian), the aquiline, the retroussé (French), the sinuous, etc. But in all these forms one characteristic remains more or less constant: the aperture of the nostrils is long and narrow, or rather its length exceeds its width (the nostrils are thin and mobile, the skeleton of the nose projects above the plane of the face). In the other races of mankind, on the contrary, two other types of nose are distinguished in respect to this characteristic: 1. The aperture of the nostrils is round (the nostrils themselves are fleshy, the base of the nose somewhat flattened)—*mesorrhine nose*, characteristic of the Mongolian race, and found repeatedly in mongoloid idiots; 2. the aperture of the nostrils is broadened, *i.e.*, the width exceeds the length (the nose is flattened and almost level at the base, and furrowed for the most part with transverse wrinkles, the nostrils are exceedingly fleshy and immobile)—*platyrrhine nose*, peculiar to the African and Australian races. Corresponding to the external form of the nose there is also a difference in the skeleton in relation to the *piriform aperture* and the naso-labial duct; the external form of the nose is really dependent upon the skeleton consequently, the above-mentioned nomenclature applies also to the piriform aperture of the cranium (see *Skeleton of the face*). The flat nose is found as a malformation in idiots, and is usually accompanied by prognathism. Other important malformations relating to the nose are the development of a tubercle at the tip—*trilobate nose*, frequent in *low types of idiots*; and the *tip of the* *note bent sideways* (usually toward the left); this form occurs in leptorrhine noses and is considered to be a stigma of criminality (thieves). *Anomalies relating to the Buccal Apparatus.*—Malformations occur in relation to the lips, the teeth, the tongue and the palate. *The Lips.*—The European type of lips is well known both as regards their proportions and their lines of contour which determine the distinctive form. Sometimes this graceful modeling is wanting; the contour of the lips is formed of almost horizontal lines, the oral aperture is very wide, and has the appearance, especially when laughing, of being edged by a perfectly uniform, narrow line, thus resembling the mouth of a monkey. At other times we meet with thick, fleshy lips, slightly pendulous, like those of the black races, especially the Hottentots and Australians; it is a malformation frequent among idiots, and occurs together with prognathism and the flattened nose. Another notable form is that in which the lips are not only thick and fleshy, but the internal tissues are so abnormally developed that they protrude from the oral orifice in a slight prolapsus; this form of lips is quite characteristic of myxedematous idiots. Finally, we may meet with the so-called hare-lip, or lip divided in the middle, signifying an arrest of embryonal development and frequently accompanied by a cleft palate and a double uvula (see *Development of the face*). *The Teeth.*—There is nothing new to tell of the characteristic forms of the teeth—the incisors, the canines, the premolars, and the molars—nor of their regular placement in a single row corresponding to the curve of the maxilla and the mandible. I shall therefore merely give the two dental formulæ corresponding to the two dentitions of man. First dentition, or "milk teeth": | 2—2 | 1—1 | 2—2 | = 20 teeth | | --- | --- | --- | ---------- | | –—– | –—– | –—– | | 2—2 | 2—2 | 2—2 | | incisors | canines | premolars | Second or final dentition: | 2—2 | 1—1 | 2—2 | 3—3 | = 32 teeth | | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---------- | | –—– | –—– | –—– | –—– | | 2—2 | 1—1 | 2—2 | 3—3 | | incisors | canines | premolar | molars | In relation to the teeth there are a great number of anomalies which may occur, in number, in position, in size and form, and these anomalies are so frequent that we may say the *smile* stigmatizes the degenerate. Frequently it is the most evident stigma of the whole face; so much so that this same smile which adds so much charm to the normal human countenance becomes ugly and repulsive in degenerates. *Anomalies in Number of Teeth.*—Sometimes there are more than 32 teeth, owing to the presence of certain *supernumerary teeth*; these will be found to occur most frequently in the case of the canines, next in that of the incisors, and lastly in that of the premolars.  Fig. 132.—Mongolian eye.  Fig. 133.—Embryonal ear.  Fig. 134.—Decayed teeth.  Fig. 135.—Worn-down teeth.  Fig. 136.—Example of a worn-down tooth.  Fig. 137.—Handle-shaped ears. Sometimes the number of teeth is less than 32, in which case it is necessary to distinguish two cases of very different significance: First, the last molars ("wisdom teeth") may be wanting; secondly, some of the other teeth may be wanting (incisors, canines, or premolars). The last molar is of no use whatever to man, because it does not enter into the service of mastication, and it is tending to disappear. We may even predict that the day is coming when mankind will no longer have wisdom teeth, and the human dental formula will be as follows: | 2—2 | 1—1 | 2—2 | 2—2 | = 28 teeth | | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---------- | | –—– | –—– | –—– | –—– | | 2—2 | 1—1 | 2—2 | 2—2 | | incisors | canines | premolar | molars | The absence of useful teeth, on the contrary, is a grave sign of degeneration, and one which leaves wide spaces between two adjacent teeth (wide diastemata). The *diastema*, or space left between adjacent teeth, is of great importance. There are various causes for this stigma. Besides the one already mentioned, due to congenital absence of a tooth (broad diastema), another recognized cause is an *anomalous placing* of the teeth (narrow diastema). The significance of this is not always the same: for example, the diastema between two upper incisors indicates a very slight anomaly of embryonal development, and, some people think, gives a sympathetic charm to the smile. On the contrary, a diastema occurring at the side of a canine tooth signifies a congenital malformation. At other times such anomalous spaces may be due to the fact that the teeth have remained small, or happen to have worn away laterally and present an almost filiform or thread-like aspect (diastemata due to microdontia resulting from syphilis or various dystrophic conditions). The *form* of the teeth demands consideration next in order of importance. Sometimes we encounter cases of teeth that are all nearly alike in form; they have lost that morphological differentiation which already existed in the anthropoid apes; there is an insensible transition from the incisors, all exactly equal in form and dimensions, to the premolars, which also present the same appearance, passing over a tooth which it would be difficult to define either as incisor or premolar (the canine tooth). Usually in such uniform dentition there are slight diastemata. This condition, however, is not frequently met with; it is much more usual to find this anomaly occurring only in part; the incisor teeth are all equal, or else the canine resembles an incisor or a premolar. In combination with this characteristic, it often happens that there is a diastema next to the canine. In regard to size, the teeth may be too large, *macrodontia*, or too small, *microdontia*. Microdontia may be due to a true and actual arrest of development of the teeth (white teeth, small and narrow, often all very much alike), or to a kind of *corrosion* of the teeth due to congenital dystrophism (syphilis). In this case the teeth are ground down and *worn away* either horizontally or laterally (filiform teeth), or again the cutting edge of the tooth is not horizontal in the two upper canines, but oblique, so that the teeth have the appearance of being broken. Often the teeth are furrowed transversely with yellow streaks corresponding to a lack of development of the enamel. Finally, the teeth may present various anomalies of position, which may be grouped under three heads: a. Narrow teeth, so placed as to leave slight intervals between them. b. Isolated teeth, planted outside the common line, or else transversely instead of horizontally. c. The dentition does not follow the regular curved line, but shows various sinuosities, usually bending in at the point corresponding to the canine tooth. *The Tongue.*—The tongue may present morphological anomalies of great importance, since they are the cause of many defects of speech. Sometimes the tongue is too big—*macroglossia*, in which case it cannot move freely within the buccal cavity and even finds difficulty in remaining within the mouth, but projects between the lips, contributing in no small measure to giving the face an imbecile expression. At other times it is too small—*microglossia*. A deficient or excessive development of the lingual frenulum may also interfere with the movements of the tongue (tongue-tie). *The Palate.*—It is a frequent experience to meet with idiots having an *ogival* or gothic-arched palate, with the vault much curved and narrow, such as is met with in animals and similar in section to a gothic window. A special bony ridge or crest may also occur along the *raphe* or median line. Lastly, the palatine vault may be divided in two (cleft palate), a form frequently accompanied by a double uvula; this stigma may also be one of the causes of defective speech, so frequently met with in deficient children. The palate normally presents a diversity of forms: Narrow and high, or broad and low—forms associated with the general type of head (dolichocephalic, high palate; brachycephalic, low palate) and especially with the type of face, as we have already seen in treating of the latter. **Importance of the Study of Morphology.**—The study of morphology is of high importance in biology, and even more so in anthropology. And since the organism is a harmonic whole, in which the parts and their functions are closely interrelated, any external anomaly leads us to assume that there are corresponding anomalies of the internal organs, and hence, functional anomalies; hence also, in man, psychic anomalies. And conversely, if perfection of form has been attained, it leads us to assume that the entire organism is perfect in its internal organs as well, and in its complex physical and psychic functional action. "Assure yourselves and one another," says Lelut in his *Cadre* *de philosophie et de l'homme*, "that wherever you see a change in the body, you will have to search for a corresponding change in the intelligence. Assure yourselves that you will have to establish this correlation throughout the entire scale, from the lowest degradations of imbecility to the highest achievement of genius, from the clearest and strongest mentality to that which is most profoundly and irremediably disordered." This correlation between the morphological and the psychic personality must be sought throughout the entire scale of human variations, from the genius to the most degraded of imbeciles, from the strongest and most upright character to that which is most profoundly perturbed. Hence morphology constitutes a fundamental part in the study of human personality. The principle of this aforesaid correlation was at first exemplified in the field of biological science only by abnormal persons, whose noticeable deviations from the customary limits, both in the external form of the body and in their psychic manifestations, gave proof of the phenomenon by exaggerating it. In his classic work, *Traité des dégénérescences*, Morel asserts that "the study of physical man cannot be isolated from the study of moral man." But in our own day, the theory has been marvellously illuminated and popularised by Cesare Lombroso, and precisely on its pathological side. The Lombrosian theories were so rapidly popularised even before they were fully matured, that it seemed as though the spirit of the times was ripe to receive them, and had awakened to greet the new order of thought, after having long slumbered over the old; thus they wrought a revolution in the field of law and morality, and even laid a foundation for the erection of a new pedagogy. Or to state it better, they again brought to light certain principles of truth that had been understood even from the most ancient times. For the principles proclaimed by Lombroso are in their general line certainly nothing new nor suddenly derived from a study of modern civilization; the belief that a physical stigma represents a moral stigma is exceedingly ancient. In the Bible we find Solomon saying: we may read the heart in the face. Homer describes the malignant Thyrsites as having a narrow forehead and ferret-like eyes. Caesar feared only those conspirators who were pale and lean. In the Middle Ages there was a law which held that in case of doubt as to which of two men was guilty, the uglier looking one should be hanged. And this same principle has been established from time immemorial in the current wisdom of the people, as is demonstrated by proverbs, which are like laws graven upon stone, and have been gathered experimentally through the repeated observation of successive generations. The proverbs tell us of the physical stigmata of the wicked: "Beware of those who bear the mark of God;" "The bristles prove the brute." Even in art, degenerative stigmata are introduced to represent the malevolent. The satyrs are represented as being of the microcephalic type. The devil was formerly represented as having goat's feet and a tail; Michelangelo pictures him with a narrow, receding forehead and pointed ears. To-day all this is shown to be true. The truth, and sometimes the intuitive semblances of truth in their relation to outward phenomena, have the most ancient and diffuse history, because, since they always existed, they were analogously interpreted by the intelligence of man. And this is proved by the glorious discoveries of positive science, which we may trace back to far distant foreshadowings; what was in danger of being lost has been born again with an overpowering fertility. The great theories of Darwin regarding evolution were already perceived by Herodotus. The cycle of indestructible material, proclaimed by Greek philosophy, formed the palpitating heart of the teachings of Giordano Bruno; and in our day it formed the fascinating halo of materialism which illuminated the face of my own teacher, Jakob Moleschott. Now, the fact that it is not new demonstrates that the Lombrosian theory explains phenomena which really exist, since they came under the observation of man from the earliest times. And the fact that this theory has become popularised tells us that the times were ripe to fertilise its renovating principles into practical action. For where is it that we find the triumphant success of science? The attainment of its most profound purposes? We find it wherever science achieves something that is practical and useful for all mankind. Because, so long as anything is merely perceived or looked into, or even deeply studied, it never attains the apogee of its scientific glory and dignity unless it finds some means of benefiting and ameliorating humanity. Lombroso grasps a principle and turns it into a benefit; and he sends it broadcast throughout human society, to purify society of the spirit of personal vengeance. Garibaldi redeems an oppressed people and saves the oppressors from the burden of being unjust and tyrannical, through a work of humanity which has no national boundary; Lombroso, by means of his new scientific and moral principle, effects a world-wide redemption of a despised and outcast class, and saves us from the iniquitous burden of social vengeance. Two great deeds of heroism, one of the heart and the other of the brain; two great works of redemption. Nevertheless, the principle of a morphological and psychic relationship was not wholly wanting in examples of practical application. Not, however, in the case of man; but in regard to animals it had been utilised for a long time back. For instance, when a horse cannot be broken by ordinary methods, the veterinary is called in, and he either discovers some ailment and prescribes a treatment, or else be studies the conformation of the forehead and the nasal bones, and if they are abnormal, he declares that the horse is absolutely untameable. In India the natives are afraid of the solitary elephant with a narrow forehead, for they know that he is ferocious. To-day we know that many children who can be taught nothing in the public schools are really sick children, in whom anomalies of character coincide with morphological anomalies; and we are beginning to replace the old custom of blind and brutal punishment with a personal interest that leads us to invoke the aid of the physician and to establish special schools for the mentally deficient. We may say that this new and reforming principle of pedagogics and the school, which transforms punishment into medical care and creates special educational institutions which are at the same time sanatoriums, constitutes the pedagogical application of the Lombrosian theories and accomplishes that social task which was foreordained to emanate from the lofty brain of Lombroso. In its special application to pedagogics, anthropology aids in the difficult task by its diagnosis between the *normal* and the *abnormal* child. But the contribution of anthropology to pedagogics is vastly wider than this. In this restricted sense of diagnosis, it accomplishes, to be sure, a complete reform of the penal sciences, but it is very far from doing like service to the science of pedagogy. Scientific pedagogy must concern itself before all and above all, with *normal* individuals, in order to protect them in their development under the guidance of biological laws, and to aid each pupil to adapt himself to his social environment, *i.e.*, to direct him to that form of employment which is best suited to his individual temperament and tendencies. In this new task, anthropology not only studies the individual, but also gives real and personal contributions to the solution of many pedagogic problems; among others, that relating to study after school hours; to rewards and punishments; to physical training, elocution, etc.; while, by regarding the children as the *effects* of biological and social causes, it establishes new and enlightening standards of morality and justice, and reveals to educators responsibilities not hitherto conceived. It will suffice to call to mind the fact that the most studious children, and therefore those who receive the greatest amount of praise and prizes, show a deficiency in weight, in chest development, and in muscular force; consequently, a physiological impoverishment the blame for which must be attributed to an ignorance of hygiene and of anthropology, such as still persists throughout the whole field of pedagogy; an ignorance which leads the teacher to encourage by his praises the impoverishment of the best forces that reveal themselves in the school (the most intelligent and studious children) in an age when social industries, multiplied and grown to a giant size, demand the cooperation of a vigorous race, and to inspire by rewards and praise a sentiment of superiority and of vanity in an age that is dominated by the sentiment of universal equality and brotherhood. The teacher ought, on the contrary, to appoint himself the defender of the race, and to demand, among his other rights, that of making such social reforms and such reforms in the school and in pedagogies as may be necessary to the accomplishment of his purpose, which is the attainment of the highest degree of civilisation and of prosperity. But this subject would lead us to repeat principles on which we have already insisted; it will suffice to reassert that the tendency of anthropology is undoubtedly toward a reform in the school and the opening of a new era in pedagogy. *The Significance of the So-called Physical Stigmata of Degeneration.*—We have studied so many congenital malformations and pathological deformations that a synthetic statement of their significance becomes necessary. All the more so, because certain principles in this connection, already widely circulated among the general public, have now been rejected by science. One of these principles refers to the so-called *atavism* and formed part of the original Lombrosian doctrines: but blessed is the scientist who is obliged to correct himself, for that means that his brain is still fertile. Certain morphological anomalies call to mind forms of the inferior races and species, from which, according to the original Darwinian doctrine of evolution, the human species had descended in a direct line: hence the term "*atavistic survival*." It will suffice to mention the receding forehead that calls to mind the Neanderthal cranium, the long simian arms, the prognathism distinctive of the inferior human races and of animals, microcephaly which suggests the crania of anthropoid apes, the mongoloid eyes and protruding cheek-bones, which recall the yellow races; the "canine" ear, the wooly or smooth hair, polytrichia, the dark skin, etc. Now, all this assemblage of stigmata which went under the name of *atavistic*, or *absolute retrogression*, were held to be in almost direct relation to *degeneration*. Degeneration was supposed to revive in us forms that had been superseded in the course of evolution, and hence also psychic states that had also been superseded in the history of the human race; it is well known that, according to Lombroso, a criminal might be defined as a savage, a barbarian born among us, yet still having within him his particular instincts of theft and slaughter. To-day, since the original interpretation of the Darwinian theory has been discarded, with it have fallen all those deductions which medicine and sociology were in too great haste to draw, in order to make scientific application of them. In conclusion, the principle remains firmly established of a correlation between physical and psychic anomalies, which forms the very essence of the Lombrosian theory. What science wishes to-day to correct is the *atavistic* interpretation of stigmata and of types of degenerates. This takes nothing away from the brilliant record of Lombroso, who interpreted biological and pathological phenomena in the selfsame light that shed glory upon Ernest Haeckel, namely, the Darwinian theory. In the first enthusiasm of that luminous flame which had wrought a reawakening of thought throughout all Europe and the civilised world Lombroso tried to explain *according to the letter* what could properly be explained only according to the spirit; that is to say, in accordance with a very broad principle (evolution and the successive formation of species) which had been divined but not yet demonstrated. We ought to have recourse, in interpreting congenital (degenerative) malformations to explanations analogous to those in the case of acquired deformations, *i.e.*, to pathological explanations. We find ourselves in all these cases in the presence of pathological phenomena affecting either the *species or the individual*. On the strength of analogies shown by certain malformations, the tendency to-day is to consider them as "*arrests of development*" or phenomena of *infantilism*, such, for example, as macrocephaly, macroscelia, nipples or shoulders placed too high, nose tending to flatness, handle-shaped ears, etc.—a whole series of stigmata which go by the name of *stigmata of relative retrogression*. Meanwhile there are other malformations which merely deviate from the normal form (Morselli's "simple deviation"), and they may deviate either in the way of an excess (hyperplasia), or of a deficiency (hypoplasia), as, for example, macroglossia, microdontia, macro- and microphthalmia, etc.; or they may deviate in a true and actual sense (paraplasms), as, for example, in the various asymmetries (plagiocephaly, plagioprosopy, etc.). This whole group of above-mentioned stigmata, which seem to have a congenital origin, or, rather, to be connected in a general way with growth itself, are called *malformations*, to distinguish them from *deformations*, which evidently have an acquired origin, especially from pathological causes, such, for instance, as rachitis and forms of paralysis which arrest the development of a limb, etc., resulting in functional and morphological asymmetry. ### Distribution of Malformations Malformations (associated, as we have said, with individual development) may be found in all individuals who, through various causes (degeneration, disease, denutrition, defects of adaptment), have undergone any alteration in development. And, since we have not yet acquired a recognised standard of *morality* *of generation*, and the social environment, including the school, weighs heavily upon humanity in the plastic state, who is there without malformation? Complete normality is a *desideratum*, an ideal toward which we are progressing, and, we might add, it is the battle-flag of the teacher. Accordingly, all men have malformations. It is interesting to see how they are affected by variations in age and social condition, and how they are distributed among normal persons and degenerates, in order to measure the extent of their contribution to the diagnosis between normal and abnormal man.  Fig. 138.—Percentage of stigmata among the peasantry, the labouring class and the wealthy class, for children and adults. On the basis of notes taken from an important work by Rossi,[\[48\]](https://www.gutenberg.org/files/46643/46643-h/46643-h.htm#Footnote_48_48) I have drawn up the following table, relating to malformations based upon a comparative study of children and adults, grouped under three different social conditions—peasants, city labourers and persons of the wealthy class. At the further extremity of the horizontal lines will be found the figures recording the number of times that any one anomaly occurs in a hundred instances. The other indications are explained in the figure itself. From this it is apparent that anomalies of the cranium are much more rare than those of the face, both in children and in adults. But in children the anomalies of the cranium (and this includes the cases of plagiocephaly), are much more frequent than in adults in all social classes; this shows that in the course of growth the malformations of the cranium have to a great extent disappeared. In regard to the face, on the contrary, or, at least, in regard to certain malformations of the face, the opposite holds good; the mandible and the zygomata, or, in general, that part of the face which grows rapidly during the period of puberty, show more anomalies in the case of adults than in the case of children. This shows us that a face which is still beautiful in childhood may acquire malformations in successive periods of growth. In simpler words, the facts may be expressed as follows: that the cranium *corrects* itself and the face *spoils* itself in the course of growth. But in the case of facial asymmetries the same thing occurs that we have already seen in regard to plagiocephaly; it is more frequent in children, hence asymmetries are infantile stigmata.  Fig. 139.—Two small examples of Morel's and Wildermuth's ear. Some important characteristics are to be noted regarding the handle-shaped ear; all children have ears proportionally larger than those of adults and the *handle-shaped* form is very frequent in normal children, regardless of the social condition to which they belong. This malformation *corrects* *itself* in the course of growth, being far less frequent in adults of the wealthy class and even among the labouring classes; but among the peasantry it remains permanently, almost as though it were a *class stigma*. Although the mechanical theories are in disrepute as an interpretation of morphological phenomena, nevertheless it is worth while to note the singular frequency of this stigma in peasants, in connection with the habit of straining the ear to catch the faintest sounds, distant voices, echoes, etc., for which the *senses* of peasants are extremely acute. The greater frequency of prominent superciliary arches in adult peasants and labourers may also be considered in relation to a defective cerebral development, connected, perhaps, with illiteracy, etc.; furthermore, the superciliary arches, together with a more than normal development of the jaw bones, are stigmata which usually occur together as determining factors of an *inferior* *morphological type*. The fact also that an excessive development of the mandible, unlike other malformations, is found with the same frequency among adults of the peasantry and the labouring class, gives to this anomaly the significance of a *stigma of the poorer* *classes*. It should be remembered that children of inferior intelligence have a deeper mandible. What is quite interesting to know, in addition to the frequency of stigmata at various ages and in the various social conditions, is the *number* of them that may coexist in the same individual. It was already asserted by Lombroso that a single undoubted malformation was not enough to prove degeneracy, but that it depended upon the number of stigmata existing simultaneously in the same individual. Now, confining our attention to *normal individuals*, we find, according to Rossi, that the individual number is less among the well-to-do than among the poor; and that it is less among the peasantry than among the working class. The working class in the cities are accordingly in the worst condition of physical development. Furthermore, children always show a greater number of individual malformations than adults. INDIVIDUAL NUMBER OF MORPHOLOGICAL ANOMALIES | Number of anomalies | Adults: to every 100 individuals | Children: to every 100 individuals | | ------------------- | -------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | | Labourers | Peasants | Well-to-do | Labourers | Peasants | Well-to-do | | ... | 4 | 18 | 14 | ... | ... | 12 | | 1-2 | 56 | 36 | 68 | 18 | 16 | 44 | | 3-4 | 31 | 26 | 18 | 52 | 68 | 38 | | 5-6 | 9 | ... | ... | 27 | 13 | 6 | From which it appears that only 4 per cent. of the labouring class are without malformations, while the peasantry and the well-to-do have from 18 to 14 per cent. Among normal adults there is a preponderance of persons having 1-2 stigmata; while those having 3-4 stigmata are more frequent than those without any at all. Excepting for a few labourers, there are no normal persons with 5-6 malformations; in fact, this is the number of coexisting malformations that is held to be the *test of degeneration*, the sign of an abnormal morphological individuality. Among children, on the contrary, this individual number of malformations (5-6) occurs, *even in the wealthy classes*, so that the child and the adult cannot be judged by the same standards. The prevailing number of stigmata among children is 3-4. Therefore, in the course of growth, many of these malformations are eliminated. It should be noted that children without malformations are found only among the prosperous classes and in a rather small percentage (12 per cent.). Accordingly, social conditions bring about a difference not only in robustness, stature, etc., but also in the degree of beauty which the individual is likely to attain. The social ideal of the establishment of justice for all mankind is consequently at the same time a *moral* and *æsthetic* ideal. Another parallel that it is interesting to draw is that between the most unfortunate social class (the working class) and the degenerates. We have seen that the working class has the highest individual number of stigmata. Rossi compares them with two other categories of persons who are strongly suspected of being degenerates, or who at least must include a notable proportion of degenerates among their number, namely, *beggars*, as regards the adults, and *orphans*, as regards the children. These classes differ in the general frequency of malformations; in fact, the chronic anomalies, taken collectively, give 17 per cent. for the labouring class and 25 per cent. for beggars. But the difference becomes strikingly apparent when we come to consider the *individual number* of stigmata. | Anomalies | Labourers (per cent.) | Beggars (per cent.) | | --------- | --------------------- | ------------------- | | 3-4 | 31 | 41 | | 5-6 | 9 | 21.3 | And still greater is the difference between the children of labourers and the orphan children. FREQUENCY OF ANOMALIES IN CHILDREN (PERCENTAGE) | Anomalies | Labouring class, pauperism | Orphans, degeneration | | --------- | -------------------------- | --------------------- | | Cranial anomalies in general | 32 | 39 | | Forehead very low | 16 | 20.8 | | Alveolar prognathism | 4 | 10 | | Enlarged mandible | 20 | 25 | | Plagiocephaly | 16 | 45.8 | | Prominent cheek-bones | 16 | 41.6 | | Facial asymmetry | 28 | 35.4 | | Anomalies of teeth | 24 | 37.5 | We see therefore that *degeneration* exerts a most notable influence upon morphological anomalies; it is far more serious than external (social) conditions. Dr. Ales Hrdlicka, studying the distribution of malformations and deformations among poor children who were inmates of a large New York orphan asylum (634 males and 274 females) distinguishes the morphological anomalies into three categories: Those that are congenital (degeneration); those acquired through pathological causes (diseases), and those acquired through the circumstances of social adaptment, or, as the author expresses it, through *habit*. And to these he adds still another category of stigmata the causes of which remain uncertain. If we examine the following extremely interesting table, we see at once that in the case of children the anomalies of form are associated with *degeneration* and with *disease*, because the anomalies *acquired* individually by the child as the result of personal habits are comparatively so few in number as to be quite negligible, and all of them are exclusively in reference to the trunk; in other words, a result of the position assumed on school benches. As between degeneration and disease, the proportion of anomalies caused by the former is considerably more than double. Hence, the great majority of malformations have their origin, so to speak, *outside of the individual*, the responsibility resting on the parents. | Organs regard to which the anomalies occur | Anomalies | | ------------------------------------------ | --------- | | Males | Females | | Congenital | Pathological | Acquired through habit | Cause uncertain | Congenital | Pathological | Acquired through habit | Cause uncertain | | Head | | 74 | | 15 | | 26 | | 10 | | Periosteum | | | | | 1 | | | | | Hair | 26 | 2 | | 1 | 17 | | | | | Forehead | 15 | 25 | | 1 | 1 | 8 | | 1 | | Face | 51 | 68 | | 10 | 11 | 17 | | 4 | | Eyes | | | | 15 | | | | 6 | | Ears | 221 | | | | 88 | | | | | Teeth | 67 | 20 | | 37 | 19 | 4 | | 27 | | Gums | 51 | 7 | | 104 | 41 | 3 | | 23 | | Palate | 88 | 59 | | 81 | 30 | 40 | | 44 | | Uvula | 14 | | | 112 | 6 | | | 54 | | Body (bust) | 5 | 54 | 72 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 9 | 1 | | Limbs | 60 | 14 | | 11 | 39 | 4 | | 3 | | Genital organs | 275 | 1 | | 1 | | | | | |       Totals | 873 | 324 | 72 | 390 | 256 | 120 | 9 | 173 | |       Percentage | 40 | 10 | 4 | 18 | 45 | 21 | 1 | 30 | The greatest number of anomalies due to degeneration occur in connection with the *ear*, and the *genital organs*, and next in order come those of the *palate*, the *teeth* and the *limbs*. The maximum number of anomalies due to *pathological causes* are in connection with the *head*, and principally with the *face*; after that, with the *palate*, and then with the *bust*. The anomalies most difficult to diagnose seem to be those relating to the gums, the palate and the uvula, in regard to which it is not easy to determine whether they are due to degeneration or to disease. In order that we may have a clear understanding regarding *malformations*, it is well to insist upon still another point: Malformation does not signify *deviation* from a type of ideal beauty, but from *normality*. Now, there are normal forms which are very far from beautiful and which are associated with race. For instance, prognathism, ultra-dolichocephaly, a certain degree of flat-foot, prominent cheek-bones, the Mongolian eye, etc., are all of them characteristics which are regarded by us as the opposite of beautiful, but they are normal in certain races (therefore practical experience is indispensable). These principles which, when thus announced, are perfectly clear, must be extended far enough to include that sum total of individuals whom we are in the habit of calling *our race*. That we are hybrids, still showing more or less trace of the racial stocks which originally concurred in our formation, is well known, but not clearly enough. The *primitive races* are more or less evident in different centres of population; for instance, in the large and promiscuous cities, hybridism tends more or less completely, to *mask* the *types* of race, producing individual uniformity through an intermixture of characteristics that renders all the people very much alike (civilised races). These are the individuals who form the majority of the population, and whom we are in the habit of regarding as being *normally formed*. But when we get away from the big centres it may happen, and indeed does happen, that the primitive racial forms or types become more apparent; thus, for example, I found in Latium almost pure racial types at Castelli Romani (dolichocephalics, brunette type, short stature), and at Orte (brachycephalics, blond type, tall stature); the nuclei of population at Castelli were especially pure. Now, as a result of a highly particularised series of observations I found *normal forms that were not* *beautiful* in each of these races; thus, for example, in the brunette race, while the face is extremely beautiful and delicate, the hands are coarse, the feet show a tendency toward flat-foot, the breasts are pear-shaped, pendent and abundantly hairy; in the blond type, on the contrary, while the facial lineaments are coarse and quite imperfect, the hands, feet and breasts are marvellously beautiful. Accordingly, the marks of beauty are distributed in nature among the *different* *races*; there is no race in existence that is wholly beautiful, just as there is no individual in existence who is perfect in all his parts. Furthermore, since there is for every separate characteristic a long series of individual variations, both *above* and *below* (see chapters on *Biometry* and *Statistical Methodology*), it is very easy to assume that we are on the track of a malformation, when it is really a matter of racial characteristic. And this is all the more likely to constitute a source of error, because the school of Lombroso promulgated the morphological doctrine that a degenerate sometimes shows an *exaggeration* of ethnical characteristics. Thus, for example, we meet with ultra-brachycephalics and ultra-dolichocephalics among the criminal classes. Let us suppose that a teacher who has made a study of anthropology receives an appointment in one or another of the Castelli Romani. Among the *normal* individuals studied by me, certain ones showed a cephalic index *of* 70. Now, a teacher accustomed to *examine* the crania of city children and to find that the limits range more or less closely around mesaticephaly, would be led to assume that he was in the presence of an *abnormal* individual. Now, in the places where morphological characteristics of race are most persistent, the *social forms* are primitive, and so also are the sentiments, the customs and the *ethical level*, because *purity of race* means an absence of hybridism, *i.e.*, an absence of intimate communication with human society evolving in the flood-tide of civilisation. Consequently, in addition to the above-mentioned characteristic (ultra-dolichocephaly), the individual would probably show an intellectual inferiority, an inferiority of the ethical tense, etc., and this would serve to strengthen the teacher's first impression. But the normal *limits of growth* for a given age, the absence of real and actual malformations (for instance, in this case there is probability of facial beauty, etc.), would cause him very quickly to correct his first judgment with a more thoughtful diagnosis. Therefore a study of local ethnical characteristics would be very useful as a basis for pedagogical anthropology, as I have tried to show in one of my works (*Importanza della etnologia* *regionale nell'antropologia pedagogica*, "The importance of regional ethnology in pedagogical anthropology"). And this also holds good for the interpretation of true malformations. We have hitherto been guided in our observation of so-called stigmata by analytical criteria, that is, we have been content with determining the single or manifold malformations in the individual without troubling ourselves to determine their *morphological genesis* or their *genesis of combination*. For example, the *ogival palate* is a well-known anomaly of form, but in all probability it will occur in an individual whose family has the *high and narrow* *palate* that is met with, for instance, as the normal type among the dolichocephalics of Latium; the same may be said in regard to flat-foot, etc. Multifold diastemata and macrodontia will, on the contrary, be more easily met with in families whose palate is wide and low (brachycephalics). And just as certain normal forms or characteristics are found in combination in a single individual (for instance, brachycephaly, fair hair, tall stature, etc.), so it is also in the case of stigmata, which will be found occurring together in one individual, not *by* *chance*, but according to the laws of morphological combination, and probably as an *exaggeration* of (unlovely) characteristics which belong, as normal forms, to the family or race. There are already a number of authorities on neuropathology, De Sanctis among others, who have noted that there is an *ugly family type* which sometimes reproduces itself in a sickly member of the family, in such a way as to exaggerate pathologically the unlovely but normal characteristics of the other members, and furthermore, that an exaggeration of unlovely characteristics may increase from generation to generation, accompanied by a disintegration of the psychic personality. Consequently, a knowledge of the morphological characteristics which in all probability belong to the races from which the subjects to be examined are derived, has a number of important aspects. The literature of anthropology is certainly not rich in *racial* studies, consequently, I feel that it will not be unprofitable to summarise in the following table the characteristics that distinguish the two racial types encountered by me among the female population of Latium. TABLE OF THE DIFFERENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TWO RACIAL TYPES *Brunette Dolichocephalics and Blond Brachycephalics* | Organs to which the characteristics refer | Dolichocephalic, brunette type of low stature | Brachycephalic, blond type of tall stature | | ----------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------ | | Visage. | Elongated ellipsoidal or ovoidal; fine, delicate lineaments, rounded curves, softly modeled. | Rounded, broad; coarse features; contour frequently angular, especially around the cheek-bones. | | Eyes. | Large, usually almond-shaped; pigmentation brown, shading from black to chestnut. | Not so large, the form frequently tending to the oblique; the contours of the inner angle of the eye less clear-cut, owing to the plica epicantica. Pigmentation light gray, blue. | | Nose. | Very leptorrhine; nostrils delicate and mobile. | Leptorrhine, tending toward mesorrhine; sometimes the nose is fleshy, nostrils thick and slightly movable only. | | Mouth. | Labial aperture small, lips finely modeled and very red. | Labial aperture wide, lips frequently fleshy, and not well modeled. | | Teeth. | Small, with curved surface, gleaming, almost as wide as long, not greatly dissimilar, "like equal pearls." | Teeth large and flat, enamel dull; difference between incisors, canines, etc., sharply marked. | | Palate. | Very high and narrow (ogival). | Flat and wide. | | Profile. | Proopic. | Platyopic. | | Ear. | Finely modeled, small, delicate. | Often irregular, large, thick. | | Frontal line of roots of hair. | Very distinct; forehead small. | Indistinct; forehead protuberant. | | Neck. | Long and slender, flexible. | Short, more or less stocky. | | Thorax. | Flattened in antero-posterior direction. | Projecting forward. | | Breasts. | Position low, form tending to pear-shape; nipples slightly raised, aureole broad; often hairy between the breasts. | Position high, breasts round; nipple prominent, aureole small and rose-colored; always hairless. | | Pelvis and abdomen. | High and narrow; the abdomen becomes prominent toward the thirtieth year, even in unmarried women. | Low and broad; the abdomen does not become prominent. | | Lumbar curve. | Slightly pronounced; position of buttocks low. | Quite pronounced; position of buttocks high. | | Limbs. | Distal portion slightly shorter (as compared with the proximal) limbs slender. | Distal portion slightly longer (as compared with the proximal); limbs well endowed with muscles. | | Hands. | Coarse; palm long and narrow; fingers short. | Delicate, palm broad, fingers long. | | Fingers. | Short, thick, with flattened extremities; nails flat, not very pink nor very transparent. | Long, tapering; nails with deep placed quicks, rosy and shinning. | | Palmar and digital papillæ | Coarse; frequently with geometric figures on the finger tips; pallid. | Very fine, rosy and with open designs. | | Feet. | Big; form tending to flatness. | Small, much arched. | | Body as a whole. | Slender; slight muscularity. Tendency toward stoutness in old age with deformation of the body. | Beautiful; strong muscle. No tendency toward too much flesh. Furthermore, the body preserves its contours. | | Complexion. | Brunette and dark. | White. | | Color of hair. | Black to chestnut. | Blond. | | Form of hair. | Short, always wavy or curly, fine with ellipsoidal section. | Long, straight, section slightly elliptical and sometimes almost round. | | Hair on body. | Growth of hair sometimes found on thorax and on the found on thorax and on the legs. | The surface of the body is hairless. | **The Origin of Malformations during Development.**—Malformations are a morphological index, and we have already shown that there is a relation between the physical and the psychical personality. A defective physical development tells us that the psychic personality must also have its defects (especially in regard to the intelligence). Not only degenerates, but even we normal beings, in the conflict of social life, and because of our congenital weaknesses, have felt that we were losing, or that we were failing to acquire the rich possibilities latent in our consciousness, and that vainly formed the height of our ambition. And when this occurred, the body also lost something of the beauty which it might have attained, or rather, it lacked the power to develop it. In the words of Rousseau, "Our intellectual gifts, our vices, our virtues, and consequently our characters, are all dependent upon our organism." Nevertheless, this interrelation must be understood in a very wide sense, and is modified according to the period of embryonal or extrauterine life at which a lesion or a radical disturbance in development chances to occur. In a treatise entitled *The Problems* *of Degeneration*, in which the most modern ideas regarding degeneration are summed up, and new standards of social morality advocated, Brugia gives a most graphic diagram, which I take the liberty of reproducing.  * A fertilized ovum * B embryo * C fœtus and new-born child * D child From the little black point to the big circle are represented the different stages of embryonal and fœtal development, until we reach the child. In A we have the fertilized ovum. Here it may be said that the new individual does not yet exist; we are at a transition point between two adults (the parents) and a new organism, which is *about to develop*. Now comes the embryo, which may be called the new individual in a *potential* state; then the fœtus, in which the human form is at last attained; and lastly the child, which will proceed onward toward the physical and spiritual conquests of human life. But so long as an individual has not completely developed, deviations may occur in his development; but these will be just so much the graver, in proportion as the individual is in a more plastic state. We should reserve the term *degeneration*, real and actual, to that which presupposes an alteration at A, *i.e.*, at the time of conception. An alteration all the graver if it antedates A, that is to say, if it preexisted in the ovum and in the fertilizing spermatozoon, *i.e.*, in the parents. In this case, there is no use in talking of a direct educative and prophylactic intervention on behalf of the individual resulting from this conception; the intervention must be directed toward all adult individuals who have attained the power of procreation. And in this consists the greatest moral problem of our times—sexual education and the sentiment of responsibility toward the species. All mankind ought to feel the *responsibility* toward the posterity which they are preparing to procreate and they ought to lead a life that is hygienic, sober, virtuous, and serene, such as is calculated to preserve intact the treasures of the immortality of the species. There exist whole families of degenerates, whose offspring are precondemned to swell the ranks of moral monsters. These individuals, who result from a *wrongful conception*, carry within them malformations of the kind known as degenerative, and together with them alterations of the moral sense that are characteristic of degenerates, that is to say, they will be unbalanced (through inheritance) in their entire personality. Something similar will happen if such a lesion befalls the embryo, *i.e.*, while the individual is still in the potential state (lacking human form). In the fœtus, on the contrary, *i.e.*, the individual who has attained the human form but is still in the course of intrauterine development, any possible lesion, and more especially those due to pathological causes, while they cannot alter the entire personality, may injure that which is already formed, and in so violent a manner as to produce a *physical* *monster*, whose deformities may even be incompatible with life (*e.g.*, cleft spine or palate, hydrocephaly, Little's disease, which is a form of paralysis of fœtal origin, and all the teratological (*i.e.*, monstrous) alterations). That is to say, in going from A to C we pass from *malformations* to *deformations*; from simple physical alterations of an æsthetic nature to physical monstrosities sometimes incompatible with life itself; while in regard to the psychic life, we find that the remoter lesions (in A) result for the most part in anomalies of the moral sense, while those occurring later (B, C) result for the most part in anomalies of the intellect. So that at one extreme we may have moral monsters, with malformations whose significance can be revealed only through observation guided by science and at the other extreme, physical monsters, whose moral sense is altered only slightly or not at all. Those who suffer injury at A may be intelligent, and employ their intelligence to the malevolent ends inspired by moral madness; those who suffer injury at C or D are harmless monsters, often idiots, or even foredoomed to die. The peril to society steadily diminishes from A to C, while the peril to the individual steadily augments. Over all these periods so full of peril to human development and so highly important for the future of the species, we may place one single word: **Woman.**—Throughout the period that is most decisive for its future, humanity is wholly *dependent upon woman*. Upon her rests not only the responsibility of preserving the integrity of the germ, but also that of the embryonal and fœtal development of man. The respect and protection of woman and of maternity should be raised to the position of an inalienable social duty and should become one of the principles of human morality. To-day we are altogether lacking in a sense of moral obligation toward the species, and hence lacking in a moral sense such as would lead to respect for woman and maternity—so much so, indeed, that we have invented a form of *modesty* which consists in concealing maternity, in not speaking of maternity! And yet at the same time there are sins against the species that go unpunished, and offenses to the dignity of woman that are tolerated and protected by law! But even after the child is born and has reached the period of lactation, we should still write across it the words *Woman* and *Mother*. The education and the responsibility of woman and of society must be modified, if we are to assure the triumph of the species. And the teachers who receive the child into the school, after its transit through society (in the form of its parents' germs) and through the mother, cannot fail to be interested in raising the social standards of education and morality. Like a priesthood of the new humanity, they should feel it their duty to be *practitioners* of all those virtues which assure the survival of the human species. *Moral and Pedagogic Problems within the School.*—Children when they first come to school have a personality already outlined. From the unmoral, the sickly, the intellectually defective to the robust and healthy children, the intelligent, and those in whom are hidden the glorious germs of genius; from those who sigh over the discomforts of wretchedness and poverty to those who thoughtlessly enjoy the luxuries of life; from the lonely hearted orphan to the child pampered by the jealous love of mother and grandmother:—they all meet together in the same school. It is quite certain that neither the spark of genius nor the blackness of crime originated in the school or in the pedagogic method! More than that, it is exceedingly probable that the extreme opposite types passed unnoticed, or nearly so, in that environment whose duty it is to prepare the new generations for social adaptation. From this degree of blindness and unconsciousness the school will certainly be rescued by means of the scientific trend which pedagogy is to-day acquiring through the *study of the pupil*. That the teacher must assume the new task of *repairing* what is wrong with the child, through the aid of the physician, and of protecting the normal child from the dangers of enfeeblement and deformation that constantly overhang him, thus laying the foundations for a splendid human race, *free to attain* its foreordained development—all this we have already pointed out, and space does not permit us to expand the argument further. But, in conclusion, there is one more point over which I wish to pause. If the Lombrosian theory rests upon a basis of truth, what attitude should we pedagogists take on the question of moral education? We are impotent in the face of the fact of the interrelation between physical and moral deformity. Is it then no longer a sin to do evil and no longer a merit to do good? No. But we have only to alter the *interpretation* of the facts, and the result is a high moral progress pointing a new path in pedagogy. There are, for example, certain individuals who feel themselves irresistibly attracted toward evil, who become inebriated with blood; there are others, on the contrary, who faint at the mere sight of blood and have a horror of evil. There are some who feel themselves naturally impelled to do good, and they do it in order to satisfy a personal desire (many philanthropists) thus deriving that pleasure which springs from the satisfaction of any natural need. In our eyes, all these individuals who act instinctively, though in opposite ways, deserve neither praise nor blame; they were born that way; one of them is physiologically a proletarian, the other is a capitalist of normal human ability. It is a question of birth. When the educator praised the one and punished the other, he was sanctioning the necessary effects of causes that were unknown to him: "But still, whence cometh the intelligenceOf the first notions man is ignorant,And the affection of the first allurementsWhich are in you as instinct in the beeTo make its honey; and this first desireMerit of praise or blame containeth not." (Dante, *Longfellow's Translation*.) The instinctive malefactor is not to blame, the blame should rest rather upon his parents who gave him a bad heredity; but these parents were in their turn victims of the social causes of degeneration. The same thing may be said if a pathological cause comes up for consideration in relation, for instance, to certain anomalies of character. Analogously, he who is born good and instinctively does good deeds, deriving pleasure from them, deserves no praise. There is no vainer sight than is afforded by a person of this sort, living complacently in the contemplation of himself, praised by everyone, and to all practical intent, held up as a contrast to the evil actions of the degenerate and the diseased who act from instinct no more nor less than he does himself. The man who is born physiologically a capitalist assumes high moral obligations; he ought to discipline his nature as a normal man in order to make it serve the general good. And this is not to be accomplished through an *instinct* to do good, which acts at haphazard, but through the *deliberate* *will* to do good, even if the requisite actions bring no immediate satisfaction, but even involve a sacrifice. Society will be ameliorated and rendered moral through the harmonious efforts of good men, trained for the social welfare. Man will become good only when his goodness costs him a voluntary effort. Hence it will be necessary not to limit ourselves, as has been done in the past, to admiring the man who is born good, but to educate him so as to render him thoughtful, strong and useful; not to condemn the sinner, but to redeem him through education and through a sense of fellowship in the common fault, which is the scientific form of pardon. The degenerate, who succeeds in conquering his sinful instinct and in ceasing to do harm, the normal man who renders himself morally sublime by dedicating his splendid physiological inheritance to the collective good, will be equally meritorious. But what a moral abyss gapes open to divide them! Because it is a short stride at best that the physiological proletariat can take, while for the soul of the normal man an untrammelled pathway lies open toward perfection. Accordingly the new task of the teacher of the future is a multifold one. He is the artificer of human beauty, the new modeler of created things, just as the sublime chisel of Greek art was the modeler of marbles. And he prepares for greater utilisation the physiological and intellectual forces of the new man, like a Greek deity scattering broadcast his prolific riches. But above all he prepares the souls for the sublime sentiment which awaits the humanity of the future, glorying in the attainment of peace, and then indeed he becomes almost a redeemer of mankind. --- ### FOOTNOTES: [\[48\]](https://www.gutenberg.org/files/46643/46643-h/46643-h.htm#FNanchor_48_48)Rossi, *Anthropological Anomalies in their relations to social conditions and to degeneration*. ---